Re: [PATCH 0/11] vfs: inode cache scalability improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] vfs: inode cache scalability improvements
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:08:35 -0500
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, gfs2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231206060629.2827226-1-david@fromorbit.com>
References: <20231206060629.2827226-1-david@fromorbit.com>

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:05:29PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
...o
> Git tree containing this series can be pulled from:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git vfs-scale

For the series:

Tested-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 0/11] vfs: inode cache scalability improvements
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: set the default scheduler to none
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] fs: Fix rw_hint validation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 03/11] vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] zram: Using GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL to allocate bitmap memory in backing_dev_store (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux