Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 03:40:38PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/6/23 2:34 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 06:28:13PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> This patch reworks bio_for_each_segment_all() to be more inline with how
> >> the other bio iterators work:
> >>
> >>  - bio_iter_all_peek() now returns a synthesized bio_vec; we don't stash
> >>    one in the iterator and pass a pointer to it - bad. This way makes it
> >>    clearer what's a constructed value vs. a reference to something
> >>    pre-existing, and it also will help with cleaning up and
> >>    consolidating code with bio_for_each_folio_all().
> >>
> >>  - We now provide bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(), for squashfs:
> >>    this makes their code clearer.
> > 
> > Jens, can we _please_ get this series merged so bcachefs isn't reaching
> > into bio/bvec internals?
> 
> Haven't gotten around to review it fully yet, and nobody else has either
> fwiw. Would be nice with some reviews.

Well, there was quite a bit of back and forth before, mainly over code
size - which was addressed; and the only tricky parts were to squashfs
which Phillip looked at and tested.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux