On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:52:42PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 1:07 AM Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Because it's a horrible point of lock contention under heavily
> > concurrent directory traversals...
> >
> > - 12.14% d_instantiate
> > - 12.06% security_d_instantiate
> > - 12.13% selinux_d_instantiate
> > - 12.16% inode_doinit_with_dentry
> > - 15.45% _raw_spin_lock
> > - do_raw_spin_lock
> > 14.68% __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/dlock-list.h | 9 ++++
> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 72 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 6 +--
> > 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> In the cover letter you talk about testing, but I didn't see any
> mention of testing with SELinux enabled. Given the lock contention
> stats in the description above I'm going to assume you did test this
> and pass along my ACK, but if you haven't tested the changes below
> please do before sending this anywhere important.
AFAIA, I've been testing with selinux enabled - I'm trying to run
these tests in an environment as close to typical production systems
as possible and that means selinux needs to be enabled.
As such, all the fstests and perf testing has been done with selinux
in permissive mode using "-o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0" as
the default context for the mount.
I see this sort of thing in the profiles:
- 87.13% path_lookupat
- 86.46% walk_component
- 84.20% lookup_slow
- 84.05% __lookup_slow
- 80.81% xfs_vn_lookup
- 77.84% xfs_lookup
....
- 2.91% d_splice_alias
- 1.52% security_d_instantiate
- 1.50% selinux_d_instantiate
- 1.47% inode_doinit_with_dentry
- 0.83% inode_doinit_use_xattr
0.52% __vfs_getxattr
Which tells me that selinux is definitely doing -something- on every
inode being instantiated, so I'm pretty sure the security and
selinux paths are getting exercised...
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
