Re: [PATCH] zram: extra zram_get_element call in zram_read_from_zspool()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (23/11/06 23:03), Vasily Averin wrote:
> On 11/6/23 22:55, Vasily Averin wrote:
> > 'element' and 'handle' are union in struct zram_table_entry.
> 
> struct zram_table_entry {
>         union {
>                 unsigned long handle;
>                 unsigned long element;
>         };
> 
> I do not understand the sense of this union.
> From my POV it just makes it harder to check the code because an reviewer doesn't
> expect that the zram element can't be used together.
> Can I remove this union at all and replace zram_get/set_element calls by zram_get/set_handle instead?

I guess it sort of helps API-wise to distinguish zram_handle (allocated
zsmalloc object handle) and zram_element (same-filled entry).

I'll leave it to Minchan to decide.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux