On 10/23/2023 8:52 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Oct 4, 2023 Fan Wu <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IPE, like SELinux, supports a permissive mode. This mode allows policy
authors to test and evaluate IPE policy without it effecting their
programs. When the mode is changed, a 1404 AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
be reported.
This patch adds the following audit records:
audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=4294967295
ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1
audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=1 old_enforcing=0 auid=4294967295
ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1
The audit record only emit when the value from the user input is
different from the current enforce value.
Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
+ Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
interface to pass mailing list character limit
v3:
+ Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
+ Remove useless 0-initializations
+ Prefix extern variables with ipe_
+ Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
exposed through sysctls.
+ Add more prose to the IPE base config option
help text.
+ Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
+ Remove unnecessary caching system.
+ Remove comments from headers
+ Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
+ Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
+ Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12
v4:
+ Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
+ Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
exposed through securityfs.
+ Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.
v5:
+ fix minor grammatical errors
+ do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
reconstruct the exact rule.
v6:
+ No changes
v7:
+ Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.
+ Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the
evaluation loop.
+ Split out permissive functionality into a separate patch for easier
review.
+ Remove permissive switch compile-time configuration option - this
is trivial to add later.
v8:
+ Remove "IPE" prefix from permissive audit record
+ align fields to the linux-audit field dictionary. This causes the
following fields to change:
enforce -> permissive
+ Remove duplicated information correlated with syscall record, that
will always be present in the audit event.
+ Change audit types:
+ AUDIT_TRUST_STATUS -> AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
+ There is no significant difference in meaning between
these types.
v9:
+ Clean up ipe_context related code
v10:
+ Change audit format to comform with the existing format selinux is
using
+ Remove the audit record emission during init to align with selinux,
which does not perform this action.
v11:
+ Remove redundant code
---
security/ipe/audit.c | 22 ++++++++++++++
security/ipe/audit.h | 1 +
security/ipe/eval.c | 14 +++++++--
security/ipe/eval.h | 1 +
security/ipe/fs.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
...
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c
index 499b6b3338f2..78c54ff1fdd3 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.c
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.c
@@ -167,9 +172,12 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
ipe_audit_match(ctx, match_type, action, rule);
if (action == IPE_ACTION_DENY)
- return -EACCES;
+ rc = -EACCES;
+
+ if (!enforcing)
+ rc = 0;
Why the local @enforcing variable? Why not:
if (!READ_ONCE(enforce))
rc = 0;
Yes the variable is unnecessary, I will remove it.
-Fan
- return 0;
+ return rc;
}
/**
@@ -198,3 +206,5 @@ void ipe_invalidate_pinned_sb(const struct super_block *mnt_sb)
module_param(success_audit, bool, 0400);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(success_audit, "Start IPE with success auditing enabled");
+module_param(enforce, bool, 0400);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enforce, "Start IPE in enforce or permissive mode");
"enforcing"
--
paul-moore.com
