> @@ -1375,7 +1375,8 @@ static void mlx5e_close_cq(struct mlx5e_cq *cq)
>
> static int mlx5e_get_cpu(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, int ix)
> {
> - return cpumask_first(priv->mdev->priv.irq_info[ix].mask);
> + return cpumask_first(pci_irq_get_affinity(priv->mdev->pdev,
> + MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + ix));
This looks ok for now, but if we look at the callers we'd probably
want to make direct use of pci_irq_get_node and pci_irq_get_affinity for
the uses directly in mlx5e_open_channel as well as the stored away
->cpu field. But maybe that should be left for another patch after
this one.
> + struct irq_affinity irqdesc = { .pre_vectors = MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE, };
I usually move assignments inside structures onto a separate line to make
it more readable, e.g.
struct irq_affinity irqdesc = {
.pre_vectors = MLX5_EQ_VEC_COMP_BASE,
};
Otherwise this looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
