RE: [PATCH V2] Consider inflight IO in io accounting for high latency devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 12:26 AM
> To: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bart Van Assche
> <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Consider inflight IO in io accounting for high latency
> devices
> 
> Please fix your quoting, it's impossible to have coherent threads otherwise.
> This is the third time I'm bringing that up, but it's just being ignored. Not the
> best way to have a fruitful discussion on how best to fix this.
> 
> --
> Jens Axboe

Sorry Jens. That was the problem with the configuration of the mail client I was using. I am extremely sorry for the inconvenience.
Regarding the fix, I thought that most of the faster devices will have more than 1 queue. Sorry for that misinterpretation. Now I understood the issue with the fix here.
I was trying to understand how to fix this issue. Can you please provide your suggestions?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux