On 10/11/23 19:42, Tang Yizhou wrote:
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx> Our system administrator have noted that the names 'rt-to-be' and 'all-to-idle' in the I/O priority policies table appeared without explanations, leading to confusion. Let's bring these names in line with the naming in the 'attribute' section. Additionally, 1. Correct the interface name to 'io.prio.class'. 2. Add a table entry of 'promote-to-rt' for consistency. 3. Fix a typo of 'priority'. Suggested-by: Yingfu Zhou <yingfu.zhou@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v2: Accept Bart's suggestion and rename the title of the patch. Pick up Tao's Reviewed-by tag.
Thank you for having changed the patch subject. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
