On 9/18/23 1:03 AM, Justin Stitt wrote: >> Change looks fine to me too, but for the love of $deity, please use >> a proper subject line for these kinds of patches. It's not refactoring >> anything. >> > > Fair. > > Perhaps "xyz: replace strncpy with strscpy"? That's a lot more descriptive, as a) it's actually accurate, and b) this is what the patch does. You just sent another one with this refactor wording which makes zero sense, please resend this and others targeted at block with a proper description. -- Jens Axboe