On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:48:39PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Convert xfs to use bdev_open_by_path() and pass the handle around.
....
> @@ -426,15 +427,15 @@ xfs_shutdown_devices(
> * race, everyone loses.
> */
> if (mp->m_logdev_targp && mp->m_logdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp) {
> - blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> - invalidate_bdev(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> + blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> + invalidate_bdev(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> }
> if (mp->m_rtdev_targp) {
> - blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> - invalidate_bdev(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> + blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> + invalidate_bdev(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> }
> - blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
> - invalidate_bdev(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
> + blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> + invalidate_bdev(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> }
Why do these need to be converted to run through bt_bdev_handle? If
the buftarg is present and we've assigned targp->bt_bdev_handle
during the call to xfs_alloc_buftarg(), then we've assigned
targp->bt_bdev from the handle at the same time, yes?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
