On 2023/8/13 23:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/13/23 9:23 AM, chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Chuck reported [1] a IO hang problem on NFS exports that reside on SATA
>> devices and bisected to commit 615939a2ae73 ("blk-mq: defer to the normal
>> submission path for post-flush requests").
>>
>> We analysed the IO hang problem, found there are two postflush requests
>> are waiting for each other.
>>
>> The first postflush request completed the REQ_FSEQ_DATA sequence, so go to
>> the REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH sequence and added in the flush pending list, but
>> failed to blk_kick_flush() because of the second postflush request which
>> is inflight waiting in scheduler queue.
>>
>> The second postflush waiting in scheduler queue can't be dispatched because
>> the first postflush hasn't released scheduler resource even though it has
>> completed by itself.
>>
>> Fix it by releasing scheduler resource when the first postflush request
>> completed, so the second postflush can be dispatched and completed, then
>> make blk_kick_flush() succeed.
>
> Thanks, applied with a bit of commit message massaging and adding a
> comment for the newly added WARN_ON_ONCE().
>
Ok, thanks!
