On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 09:44:55AM +0800, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Now that this problem doesn't exist, I think it's ok just to remove this > comment. Why doesn't the problem exist now? IIUC, it does but it's prevented thanks to outer synchronization via rq_qos_mutex. Hence the comment clarifies why is the lockdep_assert placed here. Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
