Re: [PATCH RFC] block: Revert 615939a2ae73

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:42:50AM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Christoph, it would be very helpful if you share some thoughts
> and directions.

I am not quite sure where the problems could even be.  I think the
interesting aspects are:

 - we are not directly processing through the normal submission path
   instead of adding the command to the flush_data_in_flight list and
   then going through blk_kick_flush.  So a command now gets executed
   earlier than it did before.

 - given that it only happens with SATA, it must be in some way related
   to the fact that ATA flush commands are not queud, that is when a
   flush is outstanding no other command can't.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux