On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 05:53:51PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> Updating the check of return value from debugfs_create_dir
> to use IS_ERR.
Why?
>
> Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/nbd.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/block/pktcdvd.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index 9c35c958f2c8..65ecde3e2a5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ static int nbd_dev_dbg_init(struct nbd_device *nbd)
> return -EIO;
>
> dir = debugfs_create_dir(nbd_name(nbd), nbd_dbg_dir);
> - if (!dir) {
> + if (IS_ERR(dir)) {
> dev_err(nbd_to_dev(nbd), "Failed to create debugfs dir for '%s'\n",
> nbd_name(nbd));
> return -EIO;
This isn't correct, sorry. Please do not make this change.
> @@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ static int nbd_dbg_init(void)
> struct dentry *dbg_dir;
>
> dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir("nbd", NULL);
> - if (!dbg_dir)
> + if (IS_ERR(dbg_dir))
> return -EIO;
Again, not corrct.
> nbd_dbg_dir = dbg_dir;
> diff --git a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c b/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
> index d5d7884cedd4..69e5a100b3cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void pkt_debugfs_dev_new(struct pktcdvd_device *pd)
> if (!pkt_debugfs_root)
> return;
> pd->dfs_d_root = debugfs_create_dir(pd->name, pkt_debugfs_root);
> - if (!pd->dfs_d_root)
> + if (IS_ERR(pd->dfs_d_root))
> return;
Also not correct.
Why check the return value at all? As this check has always been wrong,
why are you wanting to keep it?
Also, you never responded to our previous review comments, why not? To
ignore people is not generally considered a good idea :(
greg k-h
