Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] block: Introduce the flag QUEUE_FLAG_NO_ZONE_WRITE_LOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 8:13 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 7/27/23 03:59, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 1:39 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> + * Do not use the zone write lock for sequential writes for sequential write
> >> + * required zones.
> >> + */
> >> +#define QUEUE_FLAG_NO_ZONE_WRITE_LOCK 8
> >
> > Instead of QUEUE_FLAG_NO_ZONE_WRITE_LOCK I feel
> > QUEUE_FLAG_SKIP_ZONE_WRITE_LOCK is better.
>
> Hmm ... this patch series makes it possible to use an UFS storage
> controller and a zoned UFS device with no I/O scheduler attached. If no
> I/O scheduler is active, there is no zone write locking to skip so I
> think that the former name is better.

Okay, I missed no I/O scheduler.

Thanks,
Nitesh Shetty




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux