Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone locking if necessary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/17/23 23:38, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 7/11/23 03:01, Bart Van Assche wrote:
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 6aa5daf7ae32..0bed2bdeed89 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
  		return NULL;
rq = rq_entry_fifo(per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q) ||
+	    blk_queue_pipeline_zoned_writes(rq->q))

What about using blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock() ?

Hmm ... how would using blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock() improve the generated code? blk_queue_pipeline_zoned_writes() can be inlined and only tests a single bit (a request queue flag) while blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock() cannot be inlined by the compiler because it has been defined in a .c file. Additionally, blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock() has to dereference more pointers than blk_queue_pipeline_zoned_writes(). From block/blk-zoned.c:

bool blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock(struct request *rq)
{
	if (!rq->q->disk->seq_zones_wlock)
		return false;

	return blk_rq_is_seq_zoned_write(rq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_req_needs_zone_write_lock);

Thanks,

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux