Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] loop: do not enforce max_loop hard limit by (new) default
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] loop: do not enforce max_loop hard limit by (new) default
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 01:31:58 -0700
Cc
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
20230717191628.582363-3-mfo@canonical.com
>
References
: <
20230717191628.582363-1-mfo@canonical.com
> <
20230717191628.582363-3-mfo@canonical.com
>
Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
References
:
[PATCH RESEND 0/2] loop: fix regression from max_loop default value change
From:
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] loop: do not enforce max_loop hard limit by (new) default
From:
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH] zram: set zram bio priority to REQ_PRIO.
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] loop: deprecate autoloading callback loop_probe()
Previous by thread:
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] loop: do not enforce max_loop hard limit by (new) default
Next by thread:
[PATCH 0/3] Improve performance for BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING drivers
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]