Re: [PATCH] blk-iocost: fix seq_printf compile type mismatch error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/17/23 13:49, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:18:52AM -0500, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
From: amd <amd@localhost.localdomain>

Fix two type mismatch errors encountered while compiling blk-iocost.c with
GCC version 13.1.1 that involved constant operator WEIGHT_ONE. Cast the
result of the division operation to (unsigned int) to match the expected
format specifier %u in two seq_printf invocations.

Can you detail the warnings? Was that on 32bit compiles?

The concrete error was: "format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned
int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’". If I run:

$ echo | cpp -dM | grep __LP64__
#define __LP64__ 1

which makes me believe it is not 32 bits.


Thanks.


Thanks,
Carlos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux