Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] block: add a read barrier in blk_queue_enter()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 20:06 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index ad388d5e309a..5e8963bc98d9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -669,6 +669,15 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, bool nowait)
>  		if (nowait)
>  			return -EBUSY;
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * read pair of barrier in blk_mq_freeze_queue_start(),
> +		 * we need to order reading __PERCPU_REF_DEAD flag of
> +		 * .q_usage_counter and reading .mq_freeze_depth,
> +		 * otherwise the following wait may never return if the
> +		 * two reads are reordered.
> +		 */
> +		smp_rmb();
> +
>  		ret = wait_event_interruptible(q->mq_freeze_wq,
>  				!atomic_read(&q->mq_freeze_depth) ||
>  				blk_queue_dying(q));

Since patch 4/4 modifies the comment introduced by this patch, I would have
preferred that patches 2/4 and 4/4 would have been combined into a single
patch. Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux