Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: don't unconditionally set max_discard_sectors in blk_queue_max_discard_sectors
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: don't unconditionally set max_discard_sectors in blk_queue_max_discard_sectors
From
: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:29:28 +0300
Cc
: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20230707094616.108430-2-hch@lst.de
>
References
: <
20230707094616.108430-1-hch@lst.de
> <
20230707094616.108430-2-hch@lst.de
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References
:
fix discard limits
From:
Christoph Hellwig
[PATCH 1/4] block: don't unconditionally set max_discard_sectors in blk_queue_max_discard_sectors
From:
Christoph Hellwig
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] ublk: add opcode offsets for DRV_IN/DRV_OUT
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvme: update discard limits in nvme_config_discard
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: don't unconditionally set max_discard_sectors in blk_queue_max_discard_sectors
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: don't unconditionally set max_discard_sectors in blk_queue_max_discard_sectors
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]