On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:36 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> As the .q_usage_counter is used by both legacy and >> mq path, we need to block new I/O if queue becomes >> dead in blk_queue_enter(). >> >> So rename it and we can use this function in both >> pathes. > > Should "pathes" be changed into "paths" in the commit message? Additionally, > this patch breaks the symmetry the comment in blk_mq_freeze_queue() refers > to. Anyway: Really? Is there one function named as blk_mq_freeze_queue_end()? The comment means blk_mq_freeze_queue() vs. blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(), which can't be affected by this patch. Thanks, Ming Lei
