Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Support limits below the page size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 08:22:31PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I'm usually a fan of putting code in the core so we don't have to in
> drivers, that's how most of the block layer is designed. But this seems
> niche enough that perhaps it's worth considering just remapping these in
> the driver? It's peppering changes all over delicate parts of the core
> for cases that 99.9% don't need to worry about or should worry about.
> I will say that I do think the patches do look better than they did in
> earlier versions, however.
> 
> Maybe we've already discussed this before, but let's please have the
> discussion again. Because I'd really love to avoid this code, if at all
> possible.

I really hate having this core complexity, but I suspect trying to driver
hacks would be even worse than that, especially as this goes through
the SCSI midlayer.  I think the answer is simply that if Google keeps
buying broken hardware for their products from Samsung they just need
to stick to a 4k page size instead of moving to a larger one.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux