On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:04:58AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > I kinda like the idea of sticking with satl as that's how libata has > been doing most things even if the implementation is uglier. It'd be > great to find out whether the ugliness would be acceptable or too > much. The SATL way is simply broken. I'll just leave the code corrupting user data and 5 times slower than it could be then.
