[PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: reflow blk_insert_flush

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use a switch statement to decide on the disposition of a flush request
instead of multiple if statements, out of which one does checks that are
more complex than required.  Also warn on a malformed request early
on instead of doing a BUG_ON later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-flush.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index ed37d272f787eb..d8144f1f6fb12f 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -402,6 +402,9 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
 	struct blk_flush_queue *fq = blk_get_flush_queue(q, rq->mq_ctx);
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
 
+	/* FLUSH/FUA request must never be merged */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->bio != rq->biotail);
+
 	/*
 	 * @policy now records what operations need to be done.  Adjust
 	 * REQ_PREFLUSH and FUA for the driver.
@@ -417,39 +420,35 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
 	 */
 	rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
 
-	/*
-	 * An empty flush handed down from a stacking driver may
-	 * translate into nothing if the underlying device does not
-	 * advertise a write-back cache.  In this case, simply
-	 * complete the request.
-	 */
-	if (!policy) {
+	switch (policy) {
+	case 0:
+		/*
+		 * An empty flush handed down from a stacking driver may
+		 * translate into nothing if the underlying device does not
+		 * advertise a write-back cache.  In this case, simply
+		 * complete the request.
+		 */
 		blk_mq_end_request(rq, 0);
 		return;
-	}
-
-	BUG_ON(rq->bio != rq->biotail); /*assumes zero or single bio rq */
-
-	/*
-	 * If there's data but flush is not necessary, the request can be
-	 * processed directly without going through flush machinery.  Queue
-	 * for normal execution.
-	 */
-	if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
-	    !(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
+	case REQ_FSEQ_DATA:
+		/*
+		 * If there's data, but no flush is necessary, the request can
+		 * be processed directly without going through flush machinery.
+		 * Queue for normal execution.
+		 */
 		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, 0);
 		blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, false);
 		return;
+	default:
+		/*
+		 * Mark the request as part of a flush sequence and submit it
+		 * for further processing to the flush state machine.
+		 */
+		blk_rq_init_flush(rq);
+		spin_lock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
+		blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, REQ_FSEQ_ACTIONS & ~policy, 0);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
 	}
-
-	/*
-	 * @rq should go through flush machinery.  Mark it part of flush
-	 * sequence and submit for further processing.
-	 */
-	blk_rq_init_flush(rq);
-	spin_lock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
-	blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, REQ_FSEQ_ACTIONS & ~policy, 0);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.39.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux