Re: [PATCH] brd: use XArray instead of radix-tree to index backing pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> [1] Performance in KIOPS:
>>
>>            |  radix-tree |    XArray  |   Diff
>>            |             |            |
>> write     |    315      |     313    |   -0.6%
>> randwrite |    286      |     290    |   +1.3%
>> read      |    330      |     335    |   +1.5%
>> randread  |    309      |     312    |   +0.9%
>>
> 
> I've few concerns, can you please share the fio jobs that
> have used to gather this data ? I want to test it on my
> setup in order to provide tested-by tag.
> 

That would be great. This is my fio job:

$ modprobe brd rd_size=10485760 rd_nr=1
$ fio --name=brd  --rw=<type>  --size=10G --io_size=100G --cpus_allowed=1 --filename=/dev/ram0
--direct=1 --iodepth=64 --ioengine=io_uring --loop=8

I ran the above job four times and averaged it as I noticed some variance. I ran the test in QEMU
as we were using a block device where the backing storage lives in RAM.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux