On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:51:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Fun question: What happens when the swap disk falls off the bus? > > Your system is toast. > > > > - if (IS_ERR(blkdev_get_by_dev(bdev->bd_dev, mode | FMODE_EXCL, &bdev))) > > > + if (IS_ERR(blkdev_get_by_dev(bdev->bd_dev, mode | FMODE_EXCL, &bdev, > > > + NULL))) > > > return -EBUSY; > > > ret = set_blocksize(bdev, n); > > > blkdev_put(bdev, mode | FMODE_EXCL); > > > > Somewhat related question: Should we allow userspace to initiate a fs > > shutdown through the block device? Let's say you're preparing to yank > > /dev/sda and want to kill anything attached to it or its partitions? > > Without having to walk through however many mount namespaces there are > > to find the mountpoints? > > That's kinda what we're doing here. Or do you mean even more advanced > notice by having another callout before stopping I/O so that we could > write out all log buffers? It's probably doable, but I'm not convinced > that this use case is worth maintaining and testing the kernel code for > it. The userspace shutdown code already does this by default - it actually calls freeze_bdev() to cause the filesystem to be made consistent on the block device before it executes the shutdown. So, in effect, we already have the "shutdown before turning off block device" paths in the filesystems and extremely well tested. Indeed, if the device is being removed, why not call freeze_bdev() before doing anything else? It guarantees that applications will be quiesced and the filesystem will stabilise and not try to change anything until the shutdown occurs when the device is pulled... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
