> On 5/9/23 01:03, Avri Altman wrote: > > However, I think the decision of that should be of the platform owner, > > And not in the core driver. > > Hi Avri, > > I don't see any use case in which performance of a UFS device would be > improved > by leaving QUEUE_FLAG_FAIR_TAG_SHARING enabled. Are you perhaps aware > of such a > use case? Following your argument, then why fair allocation exists in the first place? When running benchmarks I am hacking the scheduler's "fair" tag allocation as well. That's why I acked this change. Since this change may affect the IO profile as a whole, I think the platform owners should have the flexibility not to use it, Should they choose to. Thanks, Avri > > Thanks, > > Bart.
