Re: [PATCH 4/9] block: turn bdev_lock into a mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 05-05-23 13:51:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no reason for this lock to spin, and being able to sleep under
> it will come in handy soon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Makes sense. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> ---
>  block/bdev.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c
> index f2c7181b0bba7d..bad75f6cf8edcd 100644
> --- a/block/bdev.c
> +++ b/block/bdev.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_bdev);
>   * pseudo-fs
>   */
>  
> -static  __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdev_lock);
> +static  __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_MUTEX(bdev_lock);
>  static struct kmem_cache * bdev_cachep __read_mostly;
>  
>  static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> @@ -457,15 +457,14 @@ long nr_blockdev_pages(void)
>   *
>   * Test whether @bdev can be claimed by @holder.
>   *
> - * CONTEXT:
> - * spin_lock(&bdev_lock).
> - *
>   * RETURNS:
>   * %true if @bdev can be claimed, %false otherwise.
>   */
>  static bool bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, struct block_device *whole,
>  			 void *holder)
>  {
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&bdev_lock);
> +
>  	if (bdev->bd_holder == holder)
>  		return true;	 /* already a holder */
>  	else if (bdev->bd_holder != NULL)
> @@ -500,10 +499,10 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!holder))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  retry:
> -	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
>  	/* if someone else claimed, fail */
>  	if (!bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder)) {
> -		spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> +		mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>  
>  		prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> -		spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> +		mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>  		schedule();
>  		finish_wait(wq, &wait);
>  		goto retry;
> @@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  
>  	/* yay, all mine */
>  	whole->bd_claiming = holder;
> -	spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bd_prepare_to_claim); /* only for the loop driver */
> @@ -547,7 +546,7 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  {
>  	struct block_device *whole = bdev_whole(bdev);
>  
> -	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
>  	BUG_ON(!bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder));
>  	/*
>  	 * Note that for a whole device bd_holders will be incremented twice,
> @@ -558,7 +557,7 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  	bdev->bd_holders++;
>  	bdev->bd_holder = holder;
>  	bd_clear_claiming(whole, holder);
> -	spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -572,9 +571,9 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>   */
>  void bd_abort_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
>  	bd_clear_claiming(bdev_whole(bdev), holder);
> -	spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_abort_claiming);
>  
> @@ -587,7 +586,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev)
>  	 * Release a claim on the device.  The holder fields are protected with
>  	 * bdev_lock.  open_mutex is used to synchronize disk_holder unlinking.
>  	 */
> -	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(--bdev->bd_holders < 0);
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(--whole->bd_holders < 0);
>  	if (!bdev->bd_holders) {
> @@ -597,7 +596,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev)
>  	}
>  	if (!whole->bd_holders)
>  		whole->bd_holder = NULL;
> -	spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If this was the last claim, remove holder link and unblock evpoll if
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux