On Fri 05-05-23 13:51:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no reason for this lock to spin, and being able to sleep under
> it will come in handy soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Makes sense. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Honza
> ---
> block/bdev.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c
> index f2c7181b0bba7d..bad75f6cf8edcd 100644
> --- a/block/bdev.c
> +++ b/block/bdev.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_bdev);
> * pseudo-fs
> */
>
> -static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdev_lock);
> +static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_MUTEX(bdev_lock);
> static struct kmem_cache * bdev_cachep __read_mostly;
>
> static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> @@ -457,15 +457,14 @@ long nr_blockdev_pages(void)
> *
> * Test whether @bdev can be claimed by @holder.
> *
> - * CONTEXT:
> - * spin_lock(&bdev_lock).
> - *
> * RETURNS:
> * %true if @bdev can be claimed, %false otherwise.
> */
> static bool bd_may_claim(struct block_device *bdev, struct block_device *whole,
> void *holder)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&bdev_lock);
> +
> if (bdev->bd_holder == holder)
> return true; /* already a holder */
> else if (bdev->bd_holder != NULL)
> @@ -500,10 +499,10 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!holder))
> return -EINVAL;
> retry:
> - spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
> /* if someone else claimed, fail */
> if (!bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder)) {
> - spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> @@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>
> prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> schedule();
> finish_wait(wq, &wait);
> goto retry;
> @@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ int bd_prepare_to_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
>
> /* yay, all mine */
> whole->bd_claiming = holder;
> - spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bd_prepare_to_claim); /* only for the loop driver */
> @@ -547,7 +546,7 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
> {
> struct block_device *whole = bdev_whole(bdev);
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
> BUG_ON(!bd_may_claim(bdev, whole, holder));
> /*
> * Note that for a whole device bd_holders will be incremented twice,
> @@ -558,7 +557,7 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
> bdev->bd_holders++;
> bdev->bd_holder = holder;
> bd_clear_claiming(whole, holder);
> - spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -572,9 +571,9 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
> */
> void bd_abort_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
> {
> - spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
> bd_clear_claiming(bdev_whole(bdev), holder);
> - spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_abort_claiming);
>
> @@ -587,7 +586,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev)
> * Release a claim on the device. The holder fields are protected with
> * bdev_lock. open_mutex is used to synchronize disk_holder unlinking.
> */
> - spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&bdev_lock);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(--bdev->bd_holders < 0);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(--whole->bd_holders < 0);
> if (!bdev->bd_holders) {
> @@ -597,7 +596,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev)
> }
> if (!whole->bd_holders)
> whole->bd_holder = NULL;
> - spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock);
>
> /*
> * If this was the last claim, remove holder link and unblock evpoll if
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
