On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 06:49:49AM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > > Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > >> From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Add abstractions for the C radix_tree. This abstraction allows Rust code to use > >> the radix_tree as a map from `u64` keys to `ForeignOwnable` values. > > > > Please, no. The XArray interface is the preferred one; the radix tree > > is legacy. Don't make Rust code use the radix tree. It has the GFP > > arguments in the wrong place, for one thing. > > I have a similar argument to not using xarrray as to not using folios, > see my other response. But the Rust xarray API is in the works [1]. But the radix tree API is simply a different (and worse) API to the exact same data structure as the XArray. Using the XArray instead of the radix tree is still an apples-to-apples comparison.
