On 02/21/2017 07:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 02/21/2017 11:59 AM, Jon Derrick wrote: >> v3->v4: >> Passes in 'lock_held' into opal_lock_unlock() so we don't need to >> mutex_trylock(). I wasn't totally confident in that approach anyways. >> >> v2->v3: >> Squashed 5/5 into 4/5 >> Changed opal_step structs back to const >> Cleaned up opal_lock_unlock >> >> v1->v2: >> Moved misplaced code from 5/5 to 4/5 > > Guys, where are we at with this? I'm shipping off some more fixes > for -rc1 soon, and I'd really like to get this wrapped up sooner > rather than later. > We just need Christoph to look at patch 4/4. Once he reviews it it the series is good to go. Once this goes in I have one patch I previously sent and one from Christoph I took over. After that the opal code should be quiet for the rest of the release candidates. We've ironed out all the kinks and clean ups it seems.
