Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:21:44 -0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@xxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <84b78f2d-0238-0fa1-e0b3-d46e7d4cb9be@intel.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:18:59AM -0700, Jon Derrick wrote:
> It looks good to me at first glance but I can't apply it. What tree are
> you on?

It's against Jens' for-next tree (actually from two days ago, but
nothing in this area should have changed since then)

References:
- [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
  - From: Keith Busch
- Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
  - From: Jon Derrick

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] opal: Use empty structure when not defined
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux