On 02/14/2017 08:07 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:58:22AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> While we're at the topic: >> >> Can't we use the same names for legacy and mq scheduler? >> It's quite an unnecessary complication to have >> 'noop', 'deadline', and 'cfq' for legacy, but 'none' and 'mq-deadline' >> for mq. If we could use 'noop' and 'deadline' for mq, too, the existing >> settings or udev rules will continue to work and we wouldn't get any >> annoying and pointless warnings here... > > I mentioned this to Jens a little while ago but I didn't feel strongly > enough to push the issue. I also like this idea -- it makes the > transition to blk-mq a little more transparent. > And saves us _a lot_ of support cases :-) Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
