On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:56:13PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> md still need bio clone(not the fast version) for behind write, >> and it is more efficient to use bio_clone_bioset_partial(). >> >> The idea is simple and just copy the bvecs range specified from >> parameters. > > Given how few users bio_clone_bioset has I wonder if we shouldn't > simply add the two new arguments to it instead of adding another > indirection. For md write-behind, looks we have to provide the two arguments, could you explain a bit how we can do that by adding another indirection? > > Otherwise looks fine: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Thanks! -- Ming Lei
