Re: [PATCH 0/6] block: fix blk-mq debugfs vs. blktrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/31/2017 03:53 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
> 
> When I moved the blk-mq debugging information to debugfs, I didn't
> realize that blktrace also created directories in debugfs that
> conflicted with the blk-mq directories. This series fixes that.
> 
> Patch 1 adds a new debugfs helper needed for patch 6. Greg, could I get
> an ack on that if it makes sense? Jens and I went back and forth on this
> for a little while, but patch 6 has more of the rationale on why we
> decided that this approach was the cleanest.
> 
> Patches 2 and 3 are cleanups.
> 
> Patch 4 is the first part of the fix, making blk-mq and blktrace use the
> same top-level "block" directory.
> 
> Patches 5 and 6 make blk-mq and blktrace play nicely with each other
> w.r.t. the debugfs "block/$dev" directories.
> 
> I tested this with multiple configurations, so hopefully I didn't mess
> that up this time.
> 
> Applies to for-4.11/block.

Applied with Greg's ack on the first patch, thanks Omar.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux