Re: [PATCH 0/6] block: fix blk-mq debugfs vs. blktrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:53:16PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > When I moved the blk-mq debugging information to debugfs, I didn't
> > realize that blktrace also created directories in debugfs that
> > conflicted with the blk-mq directories. This series fixes that.
> > 
> > Patch 1 adds a new debugfs helper needed for patch 6. Greg, could I get
> > an ack on that if it makes sense? Jens and I went back and forth on this
> > for a little while, but patch 6 has more of the rationale on why we
> > decided that this approach was the cleanest.
> 
> I can't find patch 6, you only cc:ed me on the first patch :(
> 
> Care to bounce them all to me?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Gah, I forgot --cc-cover to git-send-email. The series is all here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&r=1&b=201701&w=2. I can also send the
patches directly to you if you prefer that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux