Re: [PATCH 05/18] block: allow specifying size for extra command data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 17:12 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:15:55PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > +static void *alloc_request_size(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *data)
> > 
> > I like alloc_request_simple() but alloc_request_size() seems a bit
> > contrived. _reserve? _extra? _special? Don't have any good suggestions,
> > I'm afraid.
> 
> Not that I'm a fan of _size, but I like the other suggestions even less.

Hello Christoph and Martin,

How about using the function names alloc_full_request() / free_full_request()
together with a comment that mentions that cmd_size is set by the LLD?

Bart.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux