On 01/27/2017 09:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:11:14AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> I've queued this up for 4.11. Since some of the patches had dependencies >> on changes in master since for-4.11/block was forked, they are sitting >> in a separate branch that has both for-4.11/block and v4.10-rc5 pulled >> in first. for-next has everything, as usual. > > Eww. I just had a couple non-trivial updates that I now do again. > In case you haven't pushed it out yet can you let me repost first? Why the eww?! You can't fix this with a repost. It's fine, I'll just ship off for-4.11/block first (as usual), then for-4.11/rq-refactor. The two issues is in virtio_blk and raid1. For some reason, raid1 included a refactor of a function later in the cycle (hrmpf). So there's really no good way to solve this, unless I pull in v4.10-rc5 into for-4.11/block. And I don't want to do that. Hence the topic branch for this work. I have pushed it out, but it's not merged into for-next yet, it's just standalone. When I've done some sanity testing, I'll push it out. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
