On 01/15/2017 03:12 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > >> Il giorno 11 gen 2017, alle ore 22:39, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx> ha scritto: >> >> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting >> was here: >> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html >> >> (yes, I've skipped v5, it was fixes on top of v4, not the rework). >> >> I've reworked bits of this to get rid of the shadow requests, thanks >> to Bart for the inspiration. The missing piece, for me, was the fact >> that we have the tags->rqs[] indirection array already. I've done this >> somewhat differently, though, by having the internal scheduler tag >> map be allocated/torn down when an IO scheduler is attached or >> detached. This also means that when we run without a scheduler, we >> don't have to do double tag allocations, it'll work like before. >> >> The patchset applies on top of 4.10-rc3, or can be pulled here: >> >> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block blk-mq-sched.6 >> >> > > Hi Jens, > I have checked this new version to find solutions to the apparent > errors, mistakes or just unclear parts (to me) that I have pointed out > before Christmas last year. But I have found no changes related to > these problems. > > As I have already written, I'm willing to try to fix those errors > myself, if they really are errors, but I would first need at least > some minimal initial feedback and guidance. If needed, tell me how I > can help you get in sync again with these issues (sending my reports > again, sending a digest of them, ...). Sorry Paolo, but focus has been on getting the framework in both a mergeable and stable state, which it is now. I'll tend to BFQ specific issues next week, so we can get those resolved as well. Do you have a place where you have posted your in-progress conversion? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
