> On Jan 13, 2017, at 5:24 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey Josef, > >> Since we are in the memory reclaim path we need our recv work to be on a >> workqueue that has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set so we can avoid deadlocks. Also >> set WQ_HIGHPRI since we are in the completion path for IO. > > Really a workqueue per device?? Did this really give performance > advantage? Can this really scale with number of devices? I don't see why not, especially since these things run the whole time the device is active. I have patches forthcoming to make device creation dynamic so we don't have a bunch all at once. That being said I'm not married to the idea, just seemed like a good idea at the time and not particularly harmful. Thanks, Josef-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
