On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make > > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it. From skimming over the patches, I > > didn't see a solution to that problem. > > Hello Omar, > > Can you clarify your comment? Since my patches initialize both tags->rqs[] > and sched_tags->rqs[] the function blk_mq_tag_to_rq() should still work. > > Bart. Sorry, you're right, it does work, but tags->rqs[] ends up being the extra lookup table. I suspect that the runtime overhead of keeping that up to date could be worse than copying the rq fields if you have lots of CPUs but only one hardware queue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
