On 12/15/2016 12:29 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > Hey, Jens, a couple of minor nits below. > > One bigger note: adding the blk_mq_sched_*() helpers and keeping the > blk_mq_*() helpers that they replaced seems risky. For example, > blk_mq_free_request() is superseded by blk_mq_sched_put_request(), but > we kept blk_mq_free_request(). There are definitely some codepaths that > are still using blk_mq_free_request() that are now wrong > (__nvme_submit_user_cmd() is the most obvious one I saw). > > Can we get rid of the old, non-sched functions? Or maybe even make old > interface do the sched stuff instead of adding blk_mq_sched_*()? I fixed this up. blk_mq_free_request() is now what we still use as an exported interface, and that just calls blk_mq_sched_put_request(). The old (__)blk_mq_free_request() are now (__)blk_mq_finish_request() and internal only. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
