On Tue, Dec 13 2016, Paolo Valente wrote: > > > Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx> ha scritto: > > > > As a followup to this posting from yesterday: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=148115232806065&w=2 > > > > this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one fairly quickly, as there > > ended up being a number of potential crashes in v1. This one should be > > solid, I've run mq-deadline on both NVMe and regular rotating storage, > > and we handle the various merging cases correctly. > > > > You can download it from git as well: > > > > git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block blk-mq-sched.2 > > > > Note that this is based on for-4.10/block, which is in turn based on > > v4.9-rc1. I suggest pulling it into my for-next branch, which would > > then merge nicely with 'master' as well. > > > > Hi Jens, > this is just to tell you that I have finished running some extensive > tests on this patch series (throughput, responsiveness, low latency > for soft real time). No regression w.r.t. blk detected, and no > crashes or other anomalies. > > Starting to work on BFQ port. Please be patient with my little > expertise on mq environment, and with my next silly questions! No worries, ask away if you have questions. As you might have seen, it's still a little bit of a moving target, but it's getting closer every day. I'll post a v3 later today hopefully that will be a good fix point for you. I'll need to add the io context setup etc, that's not there yet, as only cfq/bfq uses that. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
