On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:23:35PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:22:16PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > cg1/cg2 bps: 10/80 -> 15/105 -> 20/100 -> 25/95 -> 30/90 -> 35/85 -> 40/80 > > -> 45/75 -> 10/80 > > I wonder whether it'd make sense to make the clamping down gradual too > (way faster than the ramping up but still gradual). The control model > isn't immediate anyway and doing the other direction gradually too > might not hurt the overall control accuracy all that much. Sure, that's in my todo list. Part of the reason is I didn't figure out an easy to do it. I'll keep trying later. Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
