On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:22:18PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Add interface to configure the threshold
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
> ---
> block/blk-sysfs.c | 7 +++++++
> block/blk-throttle.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> block/blk.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> index 3e284e4..f15aeed 100644
> --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> @@ -532,6 +532,12 @@ static struct queue_sysfs_entry throtl_slice_entry = {
> .show = blk_throtl_slice_show,
> .store = blk_throtl_slice_store,
> };
> +
> +static struct queue_sysfs_entry throtl_idle_threshold_entry = {
> + .attr = {.name = "throttling_idle_threshold", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR },
> + .show = blk_throtl_idle_threshold_show,
> + .store = blk_throtl_idle_threshold_store,
> +};
Shouldn't this be a per-cgroup setting along with latency target?
These two are the parameters which define how the cgroup should be
treated time-wise.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
