Re: [PATCHSET] Add support for simplified async direct-io

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/16/2016 01:02 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/16/2016 10:16 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I've pushed out a new version of my code that avoids atomic ops
for the single bio case:

http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/new-dio

I think we should take your extension of the existing
__blkdev_direct_IO_simple to kmalloc up to BIO_MAX_PAGES and then use
the above implementation for AIO and large synchronous I/O.

I think I can also kill of blkdev_dio_pool by simply using bio_kmalloc
as we're only doing the allocation at the beginning of the call,
but I'd like to agree on an approach before spending too much time on
it.


I'm fine with this approach, but I would still REALLY like to see
blkdev_bio_end_io() split in two, once for sync and once for async. That
would be a lot cleaner, imho.

OK, I'm getting reasonably happy with it now:

http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-4.10/hch-dio

Sharing the FUA setting to avoid the manual flush between the two, and
removing the remnants of SYNC support from __blkdev_direct_IO().

I'll fire off some overnight testing now and leave it for the day.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux