[PATCH] blk-bwt: fix old-style function declaration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The newly added driver causes a harmless warning in some configurations:

block/blk-wbt.c:250:1: error: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
 static bool inline stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)

This makes it use the expected format for the declaration.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-wbt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index 20712f0db6ea..9f97594e68ce 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static bool calc_wb_limits(struct rq_wb *rwb)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool inline stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
+static inline bool stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
 {
 	/*
 	 * We need at least one read sample, and a minimum of
-- 
2.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux