On 11/01/2016 03:05 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
+void blk_stat_init(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
+{
+ __blk_stat_init(stat, ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()));
+}
+
+static bool __blk_stat_is_current(struct blk_rq_stat *stat, s64 now)
+{
+ return (now & BLK_STAT_NSEC_MASK) == (stat->time & BLK_STAT_NSEC_MASK);
+}
+
+bool blk_stat_is_current(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
+{
+ return __blk_stat_is_current(stat, ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()));
+}
Hello Jens,
What is the performance impact of these patches? My experience is that
introducing ktime_get() in the I/O path of high-performance I/O devices
measurably slows down I/O. On https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/21/107 I read
that a single ktime_get() call takes about 100 ns.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
