[PATCH 06/16] block: don't use REQ_SYNC in the READ_SYNC definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reads are synchronous per defintion, don't add another flag for it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e3e878f..5e0078f 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ typedef int (dio_iodone_t)(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
 #define READ			REQ_OP_READ
 #define WRITE			REQ_OP_WRITE
 
-#define READ_SYNC		REQ_SYNC
+#define READ_SYNC		0
 #define WRITE_SYNC		(REQ_SYNC | REQ_NOIDLE)
 #define WRITE_ODIRECT		REQ_SYNC
 #define WRITE_FLUSH		(REQ_SYNC | REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_PREFLUSH)
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux