On 10/04/16 21:32, Ming Lei wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Bart Van Assche
<bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/01/16 15:56, Ming Lei wrote:
If we just call the rcu/srcu read lock(or the mutex) around .queue_rq(),
the above code needn't to be duplicated any more.
Can you have a look at the attached patch? That patch uses an srcu read lock
for all queue types, whether or not the BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING flag has been set.
That is much cleaner now.
Additionally, I have dropped the QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCING flag. Just like
previous versions, this patch has been tested.
I think the flag of QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCING is still needed because we
have to set this flag to prevent new coming .queue_rq() from being run,
and synchronize_srcu() won't wait for completion of that at all (see
section of 'Update-Side Primitives' in [1]).
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/202847/
Hello Ming,
How about using the existing flag BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED instead of
introducing a new QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCING flag? From the comment above
blk_mq_quiesce_queue() in the patch that was attached to my previous
e-mail: "Additionally, it is not prevented that new queue_rq() calls
occur unless the queue has been stopped first."
Thanks,
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
