On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:57:22AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:11:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 09/19/2016 03:06 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:46:46AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Hou Tao, > > > > > > > > [ CC Tejun and Thomas ] > > > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. I can reproduce it. I am wondering that why are you > > > > doing so many checks. Can't we just check if throttle group is empty or > > > > not. If it is empty and slice has expired, then start a new slice. If > > > > throttle group is not empty, then we know slice has to be an active slice > > > > and should be extended (despite the fact that it might have expired > > > > because timer function got called later than we expected it to be). > > > > > > > > Can you please try following patch. It seems to resolve the issue for me. > > > > > > > > Vivek > > > > > > Hi Jens, > > > > > > Can you please pick this patch. It seems to fix the reported issued. > > > Please let me know if you prefer a separate posting. > > > > I'll apply it, thanks Vivek. > > Hi Jens, > > Did you get a chance to apply this one. Can't find it in for-next branch. > Oh, just noticed that you sent it for 4.8. Sorry for the noise. Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
